Comments on: Responding to wire-hanger hysteria http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:02:28 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: SCPanther http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-847 SCPanther Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:08:14 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-847 Just as well. I like my sarcasm to be deadpan anyway. Just as well. I like my sarcasm to be deadpan anyway.

]]> By: blestwithsons http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-846 blestwithsons Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:55:36 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-846 Not drippy enough. I think something where the words acidically melted down the page... :eek: Not drippy enough. I think something where the words acidically melted down the page… :eek:

]]> By: SCPanther http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-845 SCPanther Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:29:37 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-845 How about this? :roll: How about this?

:roll:

]]> By: blestwithsons http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-844 blestwithsons Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:27:34 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-844 You need some sort of html tag that denotes dripping sarcasm. You need some sort of html tag that denotes dripping sarcasm.

]]> By: SCPanther http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-843 SCPanther Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:43:23 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-843 <strong>Keith said: </strong><em>And if he wants to read about the roots of the deception in the pro-abortion movement, he can look up Bernard Nathanson: http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/abortion/ab0005.html </em> Thanks for the link, Keith. Mr. Boles, sadly, would note that the source of that information is a Catholic website and automatically discount it as agenda-driven as opposed to the unbiased, factual information provided by pro-abortion activists like Margaret Sanger. Keith said: And if he wants to read about the roots of the deception in the pro-abortion movement, he can look up Bernard Nathanson:

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/abortion/ab0005.html

Thanks for the link, Keith. Mr. Boles, sadly, would note that the source of that information is a Catholic website and automatically discount it as agenda-driven as opposed to the unbiased, factual information provided by pro-abortion activists like Margaret Sanger.

]]> By: Keith http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-842 Keith Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:20:55 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-842 I've never visited that guy's site, but he sounds like a class A jerk to me. When someone says "you disagree with me, therefore you're close-minded and I don't think you're interested in having a debate" my brain forms a gravitational field so strong that my eyeballs begin to roll upwards. I couldn't even finish reading his response to blest because it was so filled with idiotic errors (and ill-founded condescension), like the idea that if Roe is overturned abortion will be illegal in America. Noooo, it will just be up to the states, the same way tattoos are regulated by states. And guess what, if Roe is overturned, New Jersey will still have legalized abortion. And even before Roe, someone in New Jersey could have gone to New York, where abortion was legal. And, when blest points out his amazingly brazen hypocrisy on the subject he doesn't even respond. What a jerk, and a total waste of time. And if he wants to read about the roots of the deception in the pro-abortion movement, he can look up Bernard Nathanson: http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/abortion/ab0005.html I’ve never visited that guy’s site, but he sounds like a class A jerk to me. When someone says “you disagree with me, therefore you’re close-minded and I don’t think you’re interested in having a debate” my brain forms a gravitational field so strong that my eyeballs begin to roll upwards. I couldn’t even finish reading his response to blest because it was so filled with idiotic errors (and ill-founded condescension), like the idea that if Roe is overturned abortion will be illegal in America. Noooo, it will just be up to the states, the same way tattoos are regulated by states. And guess what, if Roe is overturned, New Jersey will still have legalized abortion. And even before Roe, someone in New Jersey could have gone to New York, where abortion was legal.

And, when blest points out his amazingly brazen hypocrisy on the subject he doesn’t even respond. What a jerk, and a total waste of time.

And if he wants to read about the roots of the deception in the pro-abortion movement, he can look up Bernard Nathanson:

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/abortion/ab0005.html

]]> By: SCPanther http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-841 SCPanther Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:21:59 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-841 Nice site, Christina! Thanks for dropping by. Nice site, Christina! Thanks for dropping by.

]]> By: Christina http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-840 Christina Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:00:30 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-840 You were much more courteous than I was. I just told him that if he wants to scare them with urban legends he needs to include the guy with the hook who hangs out on Lovers Lane. I linked to him on my blog. You were much more courteous than I was. I just told him that if he wants to scare them with urban legends he needs to include the guy with the hook who hangs out on Lovers Lane. I linked to him on my blog.

]]> By: blestwithsons http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231&cpage=1#comment-839 blestwithsons Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:55:08 +0000 http://www.reasonableforce.org/weblog/?p=231#comment-839 Absolutely outstanding. Even, dare I say, Eloquent! I salute thee! Absolutely outstanding. Even, dare I say, Eloquent!

I salute thee!

]]>