A suitable response would be…?

I confess that I find it difficult to think Christ-like thoughts when I read accounts like this.

FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) – A crowd of cheering Iraqis dragged charred and mutilated bodies through the streets of the town of Falluja Wednesday after an ambush on two vehicles that witnesses said killed at least three foreigners.

In a separate attack five American soldiers were killed when a roadside bomb was detonated beside their convoy west of Baghdad, the U.S. army said.

The Falluja violence began when two four-wheel-drive vehicles were attacked by guerrillas on a main road in the town, 32 miles west of Baghdad. A crowd then set the vehicles ablaze and hurled stones into the burning wreckage.

And a sample of the sentiments of the locals:

As one body lay burning on the ground, an Iraqi came and doused it with petrol, sending flames soaring.

At least two bodies were tied to cars and pulled through the streets, witnesses said.

“This is the fate of all Americans who come to Falluja,” said Mohammad Nafik, one of the crowd surrounding the bodies.

Some body parts were pulled off and left hanging from a telephone cable, while two incinerated bodies were later strung from a bridge and left dangling there.

A young boy beat one of the incinerated bodies after it was pulled down with his shoe as a crowd cheered.

“I am happy to see this. The Americans are occupying us so this is what will happen,” said Mohammad, 12, looking on.

My visceral response is to want the entire town subjected to a few dozen daisy cutters. That would rightly bring condemnation on us, but I still vastly prefer it to the “cut and run” method employed in Somalia. I want people of every town in every nation to know that if you dare to attack an American soldier*, IF you survive, you won’t have a place to live anymore. At times like this I want to help as many Muslims attain martyrdom as possible. But… no.

While I don’t believe that Christ’s words to individuals such as “turn the other cheek” are applicable to governments and military actions, as a Christian I must desire and pray for their deliverance from the darkness that inhabits their souls, even as I repent of the darkness that so obviously still lingers in mine.

That being said, what is an appropriate respose to monstrous acts such as this? How do we deter such acts without being so heavy-handed as to turn the entire country against us?

Let me be very clear. I believe we had valid reason to overthrow Hussein’s government. Having done so, I believe that the only sensible thing to do is try and ensure that a more democratic and, hopefully, Western-friendly government replaces it.

This phase, however, is the most difficult and the most costly. We can’t convince everyone in Iraq of our noble intentions. Even if they believe what we say our intentions are, we can’t make them all agree that our aims are desirable.

Philosophical niceties aside, the reality on the ground is that we have personnel over there that need to be allowed to protect themselves until such time as our objectives are met or abandoned and we get our people out of there.

My only plan at this moment is that a sizeable force ought to be sent to this town, the entire place should be searched and every weapon or bomb-making material siezed. Anyone who resists is shot. Anyone that can be directly linked to the actions against our soldiers is arrested. The photos and quotes to the journalists ought to be very useful in that regard.

(And just as a sidebar, what kind of person do you have to be to stand by, take pictures and interview participants while you watch charred bodies mutilated and dismembered? There’s something to be said for having events documented, but… man, I just don’t know.)

*Though most of my comments pertain to American military personnel I should make it clear that I in no way view the murder of these civilian contractors as less significant. These attacks and the subsequent treatment of the bodies of the victims are nothing less than barbaric and there should be a response. My sentiments apply to the murders of Iraqis who support our efforts in their country as well.

And this guy’s French!!

The French have been taking a (justified) beating in this country for a while now, but this op-ed piece in the Washington Times is a ray of hope that reminds us that we can’t assume all members of a people group are homogenous in their attitudes and beliefs. There are lovers of peace, despisers of evil and speakers of truth in every country. Sometimes it’s just hard to hear them above the bleating.

This particular section I have quoted because it contains an important point that should be relayed to everyone who believes that there are no fundamental differences between religious beliefs and that Christianity’s history is primarily one of violence.

I can no longer tolerate concealing the massacres of Christians and Jews in Islamic countries, Copts in the Middle East, of one-and-a-half million Orthodox Armenians in Turkey at the beginning of the last century, as well as a million-and-a-half Christian Sudanese at its end. I can no longer tolerate Muslim ethnic cleansing in Kosovo or Palestine. I can no longer tolerate Islamist totalitarianism.

I can no longer tolerate the relativism and masochism of a West incapable of recalling its own history other than to denounce it. I can no longer tolerate comparing the Crusades to jihad, when the Crusades were nothing but a parenthesis in the history of Christianity while jihad is an integral part of Islam. (emphasis mine)

The point being, when a Christian attempts to promote his faith violently he is acting contrary to the teachings of Christ. A Muslim who is not willing to do so is failing to heed the teachings of Muhammad. This is a curious fact regarding a religion that we are constantly reminded by our own press is a “religion of peace.”

I have no doubt that there are peaceful Muslims, just as I know that there are belligerent and violent Christians. The question both need to ask themselves is whether they are truly in the right camp.

Brotherly love

This article talks about the boy caught wearing a bomb vest at the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) checkpoint. This is the one they sent a robot out to with a pair of scissors so he could cut the vest off himself.

What struck me was his older brother’s comment at the end of the article:

Hosni Abdo said he was furious with whoever persuaded his brother to strap on the bomb vest.

“The ones who sent him are stupid, because the army will give him two slaps and he will tell them who sent him,” Hosni Abdo said.

Maybe there’s more said than we’re reading here, but it sure sounds like he’s furious because of the stupidity of the bombers in choosing his brother for the mission, not at the fact that his brother was placed in danger. This isn’t really remarkable, I suppose, since many mothers over there are proud to send their sons to die for the cause.

Greed and envy take centerstage

Amazing how this person manages to combine a sermon on Mel Gibson’s moral responsibility while simultaneously holding his hand out for a share of the take.

Presumably, everyone who worked on ‘The Passion’ was paid, no? Now, it may be customary in Hollywood for filmmakers to reward their cast and crew when the proceeds are particularly impressive; a sort of profit-sharing, if you will. I don’t know if that’s a common occurrence. Even so, I expect it’s just like it is at my job; a bonus is just that: bonus.

Rather than being thankful for having been a part of one of the most significant motion pictures of our generation, Mr. Bart presumes, not only to hold out his hand for monies he has no right to expect, but to dictate to Mr. Gibson what his responsibilities are.

Aside from the pathetic greed and envy on display, this is nothing more than the common notion that people who make a lot of money are somehow beholden to the rest of us for how they use that wealth, and that they should feel bad about having it in the first place.

You took a risk and made a fine movie, Mel, and it was worth the price of admission. Now go get yourself something nice.

(Ooh, you know what would really get people screaming? If Gibson announced that all the profits were going to fund George W.’s re-election campaign! Imagine the righteous indignation!)

Turns out he only thinks he’s a weeble!

After claiming that he’s incapable of taking a spill unassisted by [expletive deleted] Secret Service personnel, Candidate Kerry promptly goes back out on his trusty snowboard and demonstrates how wrong he is.

Leftovers Anyone?

Admittedly, I have done very little research into the stem cell issue. Regardless, I think it’s safe to say that there are serious ethical questions regarding the harvesting of stem cells from human embryos. Personally, I am not pleased to learn that a Swedish study into stem-cell applications is being funded by the Pentagon.

One of the concerns, hinted at by a passing phrase in paragraph five, goes to the very availability of these embryos. The article refers to fertility clinic leftovers as one of the sources of stem cell material.

That indifferent term illustrates the ethical problems associated with procedures that artificially produce more fertilized eggs than a couple (or individual) is willing to have implanted for eventual delivery. Those embryos in excess of the desired number of children are frozen or destroyed. It is because they are destined for destruction that some feel it is acceptable to use them for stem cell research. To my mind it’s not altogether different from asking the state to allow you to harvest organs (involuntarily, obviously!) from felons awaiting capital punishment. After all, they’re going to die anyway and lives could be saved, right?

Never mind stem cell research for the moment, though. Should it be legal to perform procedures that result in “excess” embryos?

NewsFlash: John Kerry is a Weeble!

Yet another glimpse into the genuinely unpleasant person that Kerry seems to be, this article provides an account of Kerry inadvertantly being knocked over by one of his Secret Service agents.
Here’s the snippet:

On his first full day off, though, Mr. Kerry awoke determined to hit the slopes of Mount Baldy.

The image-conscious candidate and his aides prevailed upon reporters and photographers to let him have a first run down the mountain solo, except for two agents and Marvin Nicholson, his omnipresent right-hand man.

His next trip down, a reporter and a camera crew were allowed to follow along on skis – just in time to see Mr. Kerry taken out by one of the Secret Service men, who had inadvertently moved into his path, sending him into the snow.

When asked about the mishap a moment later, he said sharply, “I don’t fall down,” then used an expletive to describe the agent who “knocked me over.”

In an epiphany, I have come to the realization that America needs just that: a President who doesn’t fall down! That must be what these anonymous foreign leaders like about him. Seriously, does this not seem like a terribly fragile ego to occupy the most powerful office in the world? Truly a frightening thought.

Speaking of the foreign leaders hoopla, let’s not forget that lying about mythical endorsements is not the issue. The issue is the mindset that is betrayed by even making the asinine statement and thinking that such endorsements would be a feather in his cap. It betrays the fundamentally anti-American position of Kerry and his fellow elitists. To his mind, America and her people are backwards savages in the “progressive” eyes of the rest of the world. I think this embarrasses him and will drive his policies as President.

I prefer a President who stands up for American ideals rather than one who seeks to impose the ideals of a decaying European civilization on America.

And I don’t really mind if he falls down once in a while.

If he’d married it there would be no problem

Some Dutch lawmakers were prompted by this incident to call for a ban on bestiality.

From correspondents in The Hague
April 6, 2004

DUTCH Agriculture Minister Cees Veerman has told parliament that he is planning a formal ban on sexual relations with animals to protect the rights of pets and livestock.

He was responding to the complaints of several lawmakers, who were outraged that a man accused of raping horses walked free on the grounds that the animals had not physically suffered from the rape.

“I am considering a change to the current law to make all forms of bestiality illegal,” Veerman said in a letter to Parliament, adding he hoped to have a draft measure ready within months.

A group of parliamentarians had argued in a letter to the minister that sex with animals was a “violation of their physical integrity”, considering that the creatures were unable to give or withhold their consent.

Current Dutch health law lists some treatment of animals as punishable offenses, such as castrating one’s own cat or using a dog for forced labour, but does not mention sexual intercourse.

Agence France-Presse

In a stark illustration of where Animal Rights insanity is taking us, note that the reason given for proposing the law is violation of [the animal's] physical integrity and the fact that the animal can’t consent! How about the fact that it is an affront to human dignity?

Scientific naturalism in the form of evolutionary theory has stripped man of the intrinsic value he is due as a being created in the image of God. Now, animal rights activists have actually succeded in some quarters in elevating the animals above us!

About

The content of this post has been updated and is now located at my About Me page. In the future, you can access it using the navigation at the top of the page.