I have been pondering in the last few days the role of information and national morale in determining the outcome of military conflicts. I’ve noted several times the type of coverage the war receives and linked to others who explain the effect that it has on the nation. As Victor Hanson’s recent article, The New Defeatism, warns:
These depressing times really are much like the late 1960s, when only a few dared to plead that Hue and Tet were not abject defeats, but rare examples of American courage and skill. But now as then, the louder voice of defeatism smothers all reason, all perspective, all sense of balance — and so the war is not assessed in terms of five years but rather by the last five hours of ignorant punditry. Shame on us all.
It is particularly striking to contrast present-day reporting with news reports and broadcasts during the Great War, the heroes of which we currently commemorate, in which the national morale was bolstered with accounts of our victories and tales of the heroism of our frontline servicemen.
Aside from their combat prowess, which is awesome on all levels, our soldiers are doing a lot of good things that have been lost in endless Abu Ghraib coverage. If you haven’t been looking for such news, for example, you would never hear of this water purification project for an Iraqi village.
It’s my considered opinion that we need, that the nation needs, this kind of news and that our military needs for us to have it as well. We can’t force the privately owned media to provide it (though we can pressure their editors and program directors), so it seems to me that the Defense Department ought to go into the cable news channel business. Let’s get the good news straight from the horse’s mouth and tell Brokaw, Jennings, et al. to take a powder.
Now, some might call this nothing more than propaganda, but folks, wake up. That’s what we’re getting now, only it’s not the kind of propaganda that’s conducive to winning a war. In fact it strongly resembles the kind of propaganda our troops were treated to by the likes of Hanoi Jane in Vietnam. In short, we’re getting the enemy’s propaganda from our own press and for no more pure reason than that they favor the candidate from the opposing political party as our Commander-in-Chief.
Vietnam and Somalia, just to name two, testified amply to the fact that public opinion is a vital component in any modern military effort. That being the case, it behooves the Department of Defense to provide a source of information to the general public that can be counted on for more than just the latest acontextual U.S. body count or a lurid focus on missteps rather than the overwhelming positives that most Americans will never hear.
Somebody get me Rummy on the phone.